Kajian buktikan rakyat Kelantan sokong hudud
SEMENJAK Kanun Jenayah Syariah II Negeri Kelantan (KJS) diluluskan pada 25 November 1993, usaha ke arah realiti tetap berjalan.
Perkembangan terbaru adalah kerajaan Negeri Kelantan telah membentuk Jawatankuasa Teknikal Pelaksanaan KJS ini seperti yang diumumkan Menteri Besar ketika itu, Tuan Guru Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat pada 7 Oktober 2011.
Selepas pilihan raya umum 2013, inisiatif baru terus diambil, selain meneruskan usaha jawatankuasa teknikal, ia turut dibekalkan bajet sebanyak RM 1 juta untuk persiapan dan prasarana jawatankuasa teknikal.
Ia diikuti dengan perkembangan positif ekoran sidang Dewan Negeri Kelantan (4-6 Mac 2014) yang menyaksikan komitmen bersama pihak Kerajaan Negeri dengan pihak Ahli Dewan Negeri (Adun) kalangan BN. Kemudian mendapat respons positif Kerajaan Pusat melalui Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yasin (MStar Online: 27 April 2014) dan Menteri Di Jabatan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Jamil Khir Baharom (UtusanOnline: 2 Mei 2014).
Sehubungan itu, mesyuarat Perhubungan PAS Negeri Kelantan (pada 14 Mei 2014) berpandangan perlunya satu kajian bagi mengukur tahap sokongan rakyat terhadap inisiatif terbaru Kerajaan Negeri berhubung pelaksanaan KJS.
Tugas kajian itu dimandatkan kepada Setiausaha Politik Menteri Besar Kelantan (Pejabat Menteri Besar) bersama-sama Pusat Kajian Strategik Negeri Kelantan.
Sehubungan itu, kajian telah dijalankan pada 25-31 Mei 2014 lalu. Tujuannya adalah bagi mendapat maklum balas rakyat Kelantan atas inisiatif Kerajaan Negeri pada masa ini berhubung pelaksanaan KJS.
Kajian ini juga menjawab tiga permasalahan, iaitu sejauh mana keyakinan rakyat kepada usaha pelaksanaan KJS setelah 20 tahun diluluskan Dewan Negeri Kelantan; apakah tahap kepercayaan terhadap usaha semasa Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan; dan apakah langkah penambahbaikan pendekatan pelaksanaan KJS menuju realiti?
Rakyat paling setuju
Kajian yang dijalankan menggunakan pendekatan Sistem Pesanan Ringkas (SMS) kepada responden yang dipilih daripada 24 Dun (tiga kategori – bandar, pinggir bandar dan pedalaman) yang dibahagikan kepada dua SMS.
Pertama untuk 12 Dun dengan SMS-1 berbunyi: “Selepas 20 tahun, sekarang Kanun Jenayah Syariah (Hudud) Kelantan menuju realiti. Setuju/Tidak?” – Pejabat Menteri Besar.
Kedua untuk 12 Dun lagi dengan SMS-2 berbunyi: “Untuk pastikan Kanun Jenayah Syariah (Hudud) Kelantan dapat dilaksanakan perlu kerjasama Kerajaan Pusat. Setuju/Tidak?” – Pejabat Menteri Besar.Bagi 12 Dun pertama ia melibat 77,382 dikirim SMS-1 dan responden yang menjawab ialah seramai 5,395, tetapi yang sah mengikut tujuan kajian hanya 5,284. Penemuanya adalah seperti mana Jadual 1 yang berikut:
Ternyata pola setuju amat tinggi (keseluruhan 97.94%), menunjukkan tahap keyakinannya amat tinggi di atas usaha yang diambil Kerajaan Negeri pasca 20 tahun.
Demikian pula, bagi 12 Dun kedua ia melibat 78,756 dikirim SMS-2 dan responden yang menjawab ialah seramai 4,259, tetapi yang sah mengikut tujuan kajian hanya 3,656. Penemuanya adalah seperti mana Jadual 2.
Ternyata pola setuju agak tinggi (keseluruhan 85.84%), menunjukkan tahap keyakinannya agak tinggi di atas usaha yang diambil Kerajaan Negeri bekerjasama dengan Kerajaan Pusat bagi menyelesaikan proses pelaksanaan yang tertangguh itu.
Petanda positif
Justeru tahap keyakinan dan persetujuan daripada kajian ini (bagi kedua-dua SMS) menunjukkan nilai purata bersetuju ialah 91.89%. Ia suatu petanda positif mewakili sikap dan harapan rakyat Kelantan.
Sehubungan itu, beberapa perakuan atau cadangan yang perlu diambil perhatian oleh Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan demi KJS (Hudud) ini menuju realiti. Paling utama seperti masa hasrat majoriti rakyat Kelantan adalah inginkan usul meminda Akta 355 dan mana-mana Akta atau Perkara yang berkaitan hendaklah diteruskan.
Demikian juga, usul “private bill” bagi mendapatkan hak mengikut Perkara 76A untuk membolehkan Kelantan menguatkuasakan KJS di negeri ini. Sehubungan itu, bagi memastikan aspek teknikal dan prasarana pelaksanaan, maka Kerajaan Kelantan hendaklah menambahkan bajet bagi tahun 2015 bagi persiapan pelaksanaan KJS di Kelantan.
Rumusan ringkas hasil kajian ini telah menjawab sedikit sebanyak tohmahan sesetengah pihak yang kononnya pelaksanaan KJS berada di persimpangan dan diragui oleh sebahagian masyarakat.
Realitinya, penemuan positif ini bakal menambahkan dorongan untuk Kerajaan Kelantan di bawah kepimpinan Menteri Besar, Ustaz Dato’ Ahmad Yakob terus melangkah ke hadapan merealisasi cita-cita pada 2015 sebagai tahun pelaksanaan (fasa pertama) perundangan jenayah menurut Islam.
_________________
Wan Nik Wan Yussof ialah Setiausaha Politik Menteri Besar Kelantan
Sumber HD - 4-7-2014
Orang jahil sahaja kata hudud tidak adil
SERDANG: Pihak yang mendakwa kononnya undang-undang jenayah syariah atau hudud, sebagai tidak adil, malah memperlekehkan perkara ini, hanya menampakkan sikap jahil mereka sendiri.
Presiden PAS, Datuk Seri Tuan Guru Abdul Hadi Awang berkata, mereka ini sebenarnya telah gagal memahami hikmah kehebatan undang-undang yang menggerunkan orang untuk melakukan kesalahan.
Sebab itu katanya ada dikalangan tertentu yang mengatakan seperti "jika undang-undang hudud ini dilaksana, maka ramailah kena potong tangan".
"Adalah salah akal jika memahami bahawa rakyat akan berlumba-lumba untuk mencuri supaya dipotong tangan dan kaki.
"Apa yang sebenarnya berlaku, ramai kalangan penjenayah akan bertaubat," kata beliau dalam ucapan perasmian Seminar Tegak Syariat Islam (Tegas) di Stadium Tertutup MPSJ Serdang Jaya hari ini.
Teks ucapan beliau dibacakan Ahli Jawatankuasa PAS Pusat Nasruddin Hassan yang juga pengarah program.
Katanya, undang undang jenayah syariah adalah bersifat mendidik, bukan menghukum.
Malah ujarnya, ianya mempunyai syarat yang ketat untuk dikenakan hukuman dan hakim pula perlu mencari jalan dengan seboleh-bolehnya untuk membebaskan pesalah.
Dalam pada itu beliau berkata, perjuangan ke arah pelaksanaan undang-undang Islam ini perlu didahului dengan ilmu dan kesedaran.
Pada masa ini, apa yang wajib katanya adalah membetulkan kefahaman dan menjelaskan salah faham terhadap kekeliruan yang ditimbulkan.
Apatah lagi kata beliau, di saat negara kini sedang berdepan masalah jenayah berat tanpa mengira kaum yang sehingga kini tiada satu pun undang-undang ciptaan manusia dapat mengatasinya.
Dalam seminar sehari ini juga, beberapa kertas kerja turut dibentangkan.
Antaranya kertas kerja bertajuk Kanun Jenayah Syariah: Hikmah Pelaksanaannya yang dibentangkan oleh Musyrif Pondok Sungai Durian Dr Abdul Basit Abdul Rahman.
Kertas kerja bertajuk Kanun Jenayah Syariah: Menegakkan Syariat Islam Satu Kewajipan pula dibentangkan oleh Pemangku Naib Ketua Dewan Ulamak PAS Pusat Datuk Nik Muhammad Zawawi Salleh.
Ketua Dewan Ulamak PAS Pahang Ustaz Mokhtar Senik pula bergandingan dengan Ketua Penerangan Dewan Ulamak PAS Pusat, Datuk Khairuddin Aman Razali membentangkan tajuk Kanun Jenayah Syariah: Kejamkah Pelaksanaanya?
Satu lagi kertas kerja bertajuk Kanun Jenayah Syariah: Mendepani Undang-Undang Negara, dibentangkan oleh Presiden Persatuan Peguam-Peguam Muslim Malaysia Datuk Zainul Rijal Abu Bakar. - HARAKAHDAILY 15/6/2014
Sumber HD _ 15-6-2014
A case for hudud debates
Much has been written about hudud in recent weeks. In many of the writings, one would find such words as theocratic state, authoritarian, infringement on individual as well as women’s rights, moral policing and even barbaric. Modern Saudi Arabia and Iran have often been quoted as examples of Islamic states ruled by religious authorities; never mind that some practices in these countries are far removed from the true teachings of Islam.
In Saudi Arabia, any voice of opposition to the government is suppressed with such laws as The Press and Publications Law. Such a practice is un-Islamic. On the contrary, a true Islamic state would allow for dissent and differences in opinions. In Islam, any citizen has the right to voice dissatisfaction to the government when he/she sees that the government is unfair or does not serve for the best interest of the people. Similarly, the much publicized banning of women from driving is not an Islamic teaching. It does not help that Saudi Arabia is the guardian of the two holy sites where millions of Muslims perform their pilgrimage each year. The country is well regarded by many Islamic countries and the world Muslim population.
Iran has also been regularly quoted as an Islamic State even though the Syiah set of beliefs and practices are fundamentally different from the Sunnis which are practiced in the majority of Islamic countries. The Iranian government probably has one of the worst track records for peace. It is a strong supporter of the current Syrian regime which has killed more than 100,000 of its own people in the on-going civil war. Any right minded Muslim would know that such a government that promotes violence and crimes against fellow human beings, Muslims or otherwise, is un-Islamic.
Unfortunately, public perceptions about Islam and hudud have been shaped against this background.
Back home, the hudud issue is of national interest as it affects all Malaysians, Muslims and non-Muslims alike. After winning the general election in 1990, the Kelantan state government has been attempting to implement the hudud laws. The issue has been a topic of hot discussion for political leaders. We understand that hudud cannot be implemented in Kelantan as various processes are required including approval at the Federal Government level. There is also a question regarding the legitimacy of implementing hudud within the framework of the Federal Constitution. Many also feel that hudud is not suitable in pluralistic Malaysia.
Since then, Malaysians have been going through several general elections with the hudud issue being raised in one way or another. One would imagine that after more than 20 years, the country would have progressed very far in the hudud issue, at least through mature debates if not for the actual implementation.
Unfortunately, this is not the case, at least not what we see in the media even though the political climate has changed dramatically since the early nineties.
It is interesting to note that the hudud issue is probably the most popular and controversial topic in modern Malaysian politics despite the fact that it does not lead the country anywhere better after such a long time. It is not surprising then if many Malaysians believe that the issue is merely raised for political gain. There is a saying that politics is a game of perception. If one were to study the hudud debates in Malaysia over the years, it would not be surprising if the findings show that the Malaysian public perception has been successfully shaped to achieve the agenda of certain groups.
While some politicians are benefitting from the hudud issue, Malaysians from all walks of life continue to face many problems including rising cost of living, increasing crime, social ills, unaffordable housing and child abuse. These issues affect the day-to-day lives of all Malaysians. The high cost of living continues to burden city dwellers. People feel less safe and many residential areas choose to implement gated and guarded communities to minimize robberies and petty crimes. In urban areas, many people find it difficult to own a house.
The fact that hudud is only one aspect of Islam does not seem to interest the politicians or the media, or it is intentionally left out as it does not benefit any party perhaps. It is perplexing to see that public discussions do not dwell on hudud in a wider perspective rather than discuss it as a stand-alone, isolated topic which more often than not gives an unfair portrayal of Islamic systems and laws. Why are our leaders are so focused on the hudud issue when many other bigger and urgent problems facing ordinary Malaysians have not been properly addressed? If it is to satisfy the Muslims, aren’t issues such as increasing crime, accountability, transparency and rising cost of living Islamic? What about the other shariah practices that are more important than hudud? Why are we selective in our debates and discussions?
It goes without saying that Islam upholds the rule of law, independent judiciary, promotes fair distribution of wealth, guarantees access to education for all citizens, commits to healthcare access for everyone and allows freedom of speech regardless of creed, color or gender. Islam promotes peaceful co-existence between Muslims and non-Muslims and these have been demonstrated when Islam, in its true form, ruled many territories centuries ago.
Islam respects the rights of non-Muslims to practice their beliefs and cultures and to conduct their daily lives freely. Islam recognizes individual freedom for each citizen, but Islam treats the interest of communities and country higher than individual interest. In Islam, any citizen has the right to advice the government when he/she sees that the government does not serve the best interest of the public. Islam calls for prudent spending of a country’s income and promotes transparency in the way governments carry out their businesses.
It is also worth noting that priority setting is also a key consideration in implementing Islam and governing a country. Thus any policy or program must be accorded its rightful place in the priority list so that sufficient resources can be allocated for implementation.
It appears that the divide-and-rule formula is still in force, intentionally or not. Race and religion cards are still used by political parties for various purposes, children still go to different types of schools including vernacular schools, and the income gap between the rich and the poor seems to be wider. There seem to be invisible walls between different communities preventing mutual understanding between each other, including hot topics such as hudud. Little wonder not much has been achieved to promote healthy public debates. - ES
Sumber HD - 15-6-2014
In Saudi Arabia, any voice of opposition to the government is suppressed with such laws as The Press and Publications Law. Such a practice is un-Islamic. On the contrary, a true Islamic state would allow for dissent and differences in opinions. In Islam, any citizen has the right to voice dissatisfaction to the government when he/she sees that the government is unfair or does not serve for the best interest of the people. Similarly, the much publicized banning of women from driving is not an Islamic teaching. It does not help that Saudi Arabia is the guardian of the two holy sites where millions of Muslims perform their pilgrimage each year. The country is well regarded by many Islamic countries and the world Muslim population.
Iran has also been regularly quoted as an Islamic State even though the Syiah set of beliefs and practices are fundamentally different from the Sunnis which are practiced in the majority of Islamic countries. The Iranian government probably has one of the worst track records for peace. It is a strong supporter of the current Syrian regime which has killed more than 100,000 of its own people in the on-going civil war. Any right minded Muslim would know that such a government that promotes violence and crimes against fellow human beings, Muslims or otherwise, is un-Islamic.
Unfortunately, public perceptions about Islam and hudud have been shaped against this background.
Back home, the hudud issue is of national interest as it affects all Malaysians, Muslims and non-Muslims alike. After winning the general election in 1990, the Kelantan state government has been attempting to implement the hudud laws. The issue has been a topic of hot discussion for political leaders. We understand that hudud cannot be implemented in Kelantan as various processes are required including approval at the Federal Government level. There is also a question regarding the legitimacy of implementing hudud within the framework of the Federal Constitution. Many also feel that hudud is not suitable in pluralistic Malaysia.
Since then, Malaysians have been going through several general elections with the hudud issue being raised in one way or another. One would imagine that after more than 20 years, the country would have progressed very far in the hudud issue, at least through mature debates if not for the actual implementation.
Unfortunately, this is not the case, at least not what we see in the media even though the political climate has changed dramatically since the early nineties.
It is interesting to note that the hudud issue is probably the most popular and controversial topic in modern Malaysian politics despite the fact that it does not lead the country anywhere better after such a long time. It is not surprising then if many Malaysians believe that the issue is merely raised for political gain. There is a saying that politics is a game of perception. If one were to study the hudud debates in Malaysia over the years, it would not be surprising if the findings show that the Malaysian public perception has been successfully shaped to achieve the agenda of certain groups.
While some politicians are benefitting from the hudud issue, Malaysians from all walks of life continue to face many problems including rising cost of living, increasing crime, social ills, unaffordable housing and child abuse. These issues affect the day-to-day lives of all Malaysians. The high cost of living continues to burden city dwellers. People feel less safe and many residential areas choose to implement gated and guarded communities to minimize robberies and petty crimes. In urban areas, many people find it difficult to own a house.
The fact that hudud is only one aspect of Islam does not seem to interest the politicians or the media, or it is intentionally left out as it does not benefit any party perhaps. It is perplexing to see that public discussions do not dwell on hudud in a wider perspective rather than discuss it as a stand-alone, isolated topic which more often than not gives an unfair portrayal of Islamic systems and laws. Why are our leaders are so focused on the hudud issue when many other bigger and urgent problems facing ordinary Malaysians have not been properly addressed? If it is to satisfy the Muslims, aren’t issues such as increasing crime, accountability, transparency and rising cost of living Islamic? What about the other shariah practices that are more important than hudud? Why are we selective in our debates and discussions?
It goes without saying that Islam upholds the rule of law, independent judiciary, promotes fair distribution of wealth, guarantees access to education for all citizens, commits to healthcare access for everyone and allows freedom of speech regardless of creed, color or gender. Islam promotes peaceful co-existence between Muslims and non-Muslims and these have been demonstrated when Islam, in its true form, ruled many territories centuries ago.
Islam respects the rights of non-Muslims to practice their beliefs and cultures and to conduct their daily lives freely. Islam recognizes individual freedom for each citizen, but Islam treats the interest of communities and country higher than individual interest. In Islam, any citizen has the right to advice the government when he/she sees that the government does not serve the best interest of the public. Islam calls for prudent spending of a country’s income and promotes transparency in the way governments carry out their businesses.
It is also worth noting that priority setting is also a key consideration in implementing Islam and governing a country. Thus any policy or program must be accorded its rightful place in the priority list so that sufficient resources can be allocated for implementation.
It appears that the divide-and-rule formula is still in force, intentionally or not. Race and religion cards are still used by political parties for various purposes, children still go to different types of schools including vernacular schools, and the income gap between the rich and the poor seems to be wider. There seem to be invisible walls between different communities preventing mutual understanding between each other, including hot topics such as hudud. Little wonder not much has been achieved to promote healthy public debates. - ES
Sumber HD - 15-6-2014
Hudud: Beza antara Speaker Dun PR dengan BN
SHAH ALAM: Umno tidak ikhlas membincangkan pelaksanaan hukum hudud sebaliknya hanya berminat mempermainkan isu itu dengan menjadikan sebagai senjata politik.Ini dapat dilihat apabila Speaker Umno dalam persidangan Dewan Undangan Negeri Terengganu sendiri menolak usul membahaskan isu hudud yang cuba dibawa Adun PAS kerana bimbang menimbulkan kemarahan parti komponen Barisan Nasional, MCA dan Parti Gerakan.
Ahli Parlimen Shah Alam, Khalid Abdul Samad berkata, Speaker Dewan Negeri Selangor, Hannah Yeoh yang merupakan Adun daripada DAP pula memutuskan untuk membenarkan isu hudud dibahaskan di persidangan DNS berbanding Umno di Terengganu.
“Umno bukan sahaja tidak mempunyai kesungguhan malah tidak pernah berniat untuk melihat undang-undang Islam dilaksanakan atau sekurang-kurangnya menaikkan taraf institusi Mahkamah Syariah di Malaysia.
“Mereka tidak membawakan usul hudud ini di negeri dikuasai mereka sebab isu hudud ini adalah senjata untuk melagakan PAS dan DAP,” kata Khalid ketika dihubungi Selangor Kini di sini, hari ini.
Pada 15 April lalu, Speaker Dun Terengganu, Mohd Zubir Embong menolak usul yang dibawa oleh Adun Bukit Payong (PAS), Mohd Nor Hamzah di bawah peraturan mesyuarat Fasal 30 Peraturan-peraturan dan Perintah Tetap Dun.
Mohd Nor meminta persidangan ditangguh mengikut Fasal 30 Peraturan-peraturan Mesyuarat Dewan Undangan Negeri bagi membolehkan dewan merundingkan isu pelaksanaan Enakmen Kesalahan Jenayah Syariah (Hudud dan Qisas) Terengganu 1432H/ 2002M yang diluluskan oleh dewan itu pada 7 Julai 2002.
Mohd Nor berkata, tindakan menolak usul itu berikutan Umno Terengganu cuba melepaskan diri dan takut dengan tekanan daripada parti komponen Barisan Nasional (BN) terutama MCA dan MIC.
Sumber HD - 14-6-2014
Punca sebenar Umno S'gor tarik balik usul hudud
KUALA LUMPUR: Umno Selangor memberi alasan kononnya laporan yang mengelirukan oleh akhbar Cina sebagai punca mereka menarik balik usul berkaitan perlaksanaan hudud di Selangor seperti diumumkan hari ini.
Ketua Pembangkang Selangor Datuk Mohd Shamsudin Lias berkata banyak akhbar Cina menghubunginya dan telah salah faham berhubung usul asal yang mahu dibawa ke Dewan Negeri Selangor itu.
"Ia bukan rang undang-undang persendirian. Ia hanya bertanya kepada kerajaan (negeri) sama ada mereka mahu laksanakan hudud (atau tidak)," kata beliau dipetik Malaysiakini.
Dalam pada itu, satu sumber yang dekat dengan Umno Selangor memberitahu Harakahdaily, punca sebenar penarikan itu adalah kerana usul yang pada asalnya mahu memerangkap PAS Selangor itu telah "makan tuan".
"Pada asalnya mereka menyangka speaker (Hannah Yeoh) dari DAP sudah pasti akan menolak usul tersebut kerana DAP sejak awal konsisten menolak hudud.
"Jika benar berlaku penolakan oleh speaker, maka mereka akan menjadikan itu sebagai bukti bahawa PAS benar-benar tunduk kepada DAP dengan membenarkan usul itu ditolak.
"Namun sebaliknya pula berlaku apabila speaker membenarkan usul tersebut dikemukakan dan kali ini Umno pula terperangkap dengan jerat yang dibuat sendiri," katanya yang tidak mahu namanya didedahkan.
Sebelum ini Adun Umno Sungai Air Tawar, Kamarol Zaki Abdul Malik membawakan usul itu di bawah Peraturan 26, Peraturan-peraturan Tetap Dewan Negeri Selangor.
Usul tersebut berbunyi:"Bahawa Dewan yang mulia ini menggesa kerajaan negeri Selangor mengkaji kebarangkalian pelaksanaan undang-undang hudud pada masa hadapan di negeri Selangor selaras dengan peruntukan Perlembagaan Persekutuan perkara 3 iaitu Islam sebagai agama Persekutuan".
Penerimaan usul itu bagaimanapun memberi tamparan hebat buat bukan sahaja kepada Umno, malah BN secara keseluruhan.
Ada cakap-cakap dari dalaman Umno sendiri bahawa usul yang dibawa itu mencerminkan sikap "tidak cerdik politik" pemimpin Umno Selangor.
Selain mengingkari pandangan presiden parti, Datuk Seri Najib Razak yang menegaskan Malaysia tidak akan melaksanakan hudud, tindakan Umno Selangor itu juga disifatkan "terlebih sudu dari kuah".
Ini kerana dakwa mereka, Kerajaan Pusat telahpun menubuhkan jawatankuasa teknikal membincangkan isu ini, namun Umno Selangor seperti mahu mendahului jawatankuasa ini.
"Mengapa yang baru jadi Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri sepenggal dua, solat pun kadang-kadang tertinggal galak sangat mahu membicara hudud ini?
"Bagaimana Umno akan menjawab pertanyaan parti lawan mengapa usul ini dibawa ke Dun Selangor bukannya Dun Johor, Kedah, Perak, Pahang, Terengganu, Sabah dan Negeri Sembilan yang mana Umno mempunyai majoriti untuk melaksanakannya," soal beberapa blog pro-Umno. - HARAKAHDAILY 13/6/2014
Sumber HD -13-6-2014
Sah Umno main wayang: Usul hudud ditarik balik
KUALA LUMPUR: Bidasan PAS Selangor terhadap cadangan seorang Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri (Adun) BN daripada Umno untuk mengemukakan usul pelaksanaan hukum hudud di negeri ini tepat apabila parti itu membuat pusingan-U apabila menarik balik usul yang dikemukakan.Ketua Pembangkang Selangor Datuk Mohd Shamsudin Lias (gambar) memberitahu telah menarik balik usul mengenai kebarangkalian pelaksanaan hudud di Selangor hari ini kerana mendakwa "timbul banyak kekeliruan".
Jelas Shamsudin, usul berkenaan ditarik balik kerana ia masih boleh ditanya dalam sesi perbahasan dan tidak perlu dikemuka melalui usul khusus.
Ketika dihubungi Malaysiakini, Adun Sungai Burong itu berkata keputusan itu dibuat dengan persetujuan pemimpin BN Selangor.
"Ia bukan rang undang-undang persendirian. Ia hanya bertanya kepada kerajaan (negeri) sama ada mereka mahu laksanakan hudud (atau tidak).
"Kalau macam ini, kita boleh tanya dalam perbahasan," katanya.
Speaker Dun Selangor, Hannah Yeoh sebelum ini mengumumkan menerima tiga usul dikemukakan wakil BN untuk sidang akan datang termasuk pelaksanaan hudud.
Tindakan Hannah itu dilihat pemerhati politik telah meletakkan Umno dalam dilema kerana menerima kritikan hebat sekutunya dalam BN iaitu MCA dan Gerakan.
Shamsudin menjelas lanjut, kekeliruan timbul sebelum ini apabila ramai pihak menyangka BN Selangor memajukan usul untuk melaksanakan hudud di Selangor.
Beliau seterusnya menyalahkan akhbar berbahasa Cina yang menumpukan perkara itu.
"Saya fikir silap faham ini berlaku kerana terlalu banyak akhbar Cina menghubungi saya untuk bertanya tentangnya," katanya tanpa menyebut nama akbar tertentu.
Menurutnya juga, tindakan menarik balik usul selepas ia diluluskan speaker untuk dibahaskan juga adalah satu perkara biasa.
"Itu perkara biasa. Usul ini, kalau kita tengok dalam sidang Dun dan Parlimen boleh ditarik sebelum atau pada tarikh ia akan dibacakan," katanya.
Sebelum ini, anggota Dewan Undangan Negeri (ADUN) Sungai Air Tawar, Kamarol Zaki Abdul Malik membawakan usul itu di bawah Peraturan 26, Peraturan-peraturan Tetap Dewan Negeri Selangor.
Usul tersebut berbunyi:
"Bahawa Dewan yang mulia ini menggesa kerajaan negeri Selangor mengkaji kebarangkalian pelaksanaan undang-undang hudud pada masa hadapan di negeri Selangor selaras dengan peruntukan Perlembagaan Persekutuan perkara 3 iaitu Islam sebagai agama Persekutuan".
Pesuruhjaya PAS negeri, Iskandar Abdul Samad sebelum ini mempersoalkan tindakan Adun Umno itu dan menyifatkannya sebagai "hanya bermain politik”.
“Kenapa baru sekarang Umno hendak cadang bentang di Dewan? Mereka ada lebih 50 tahun (memerintah Selangor) tetapi tidak melakukannya?
“Hanya setelah mereka menjadi pembangkang di Selangor barulah mereka hendak bercakap tentang hudud?” ulas beliau ketika dihubungi Harakahdaily.
Menurut beliau, PAS telah mengadakan penerangan kepada rakyat tentang hukum jenayah syariah dan meluluskan enakmen berkaitan sebaik sahaja mendapat kuasa di Kelantan.
“Di Terengganu pula, kerajaan BN negeri telah menolak pelaksanaan hudud di negeri itu,” ujarnya.
Beliau yang juga Ahli Majlis Mesyuarat Kerajaan Negeri sekali lagi menegaskan bahawa Umno perlu melaksanakan undang-undang jenayah syariah di negeri yang dikuasai mereka jika benar-benar ikhlas ingin mendaulatkan syariat Islam dan tidak hanya bermain politik. - HARAKAHDAILY, 13/6/2014
Sumber HD - 13-6-2014
Selangor Speaker allows hudud motion to be debated
Selangor Speaker Hannah Yeoh had allowed a motion on hudud to be tabled by BN in the state assembly next week.
In a press conference, Yeoh said she approved three out of four motions filed by BN, which included the feasibility study on hudud.
According to the Subang Jaya assemblywoman, she rejected the motion on Selangor’s water rationing exercise as it had been debated in the assembly before this.
Meanwhile, DAP secretary general Lim Guan Eng welcomed Yeoh’s decision to allow the debate on hudud.
He said although the party did not agree with the motion, but insisted that Yeoh did the right thing by allowing assemblypersons’ democratic right to be exercised.
"Do you want her to be like BN speakers or democratic like Pakatan speakers?" asked Lim.
Nevertheless, the Penang chief minister said the party had instructed all its assemblypersons to vote against the motion.
"Let the motion be debated and let the assembly decide. But now, it is clear as to who is first to move the motion. It is BN and UMNO, and not Pakatan," added Lim.
In another development, MCA, which has no seats in Selangor, now trained its gun on DAP after failing to ‘force’ UMNO to withdraw the hudud motion proposed by its Sungai Air Tawar assemblyperson Kamarol Zaki Abdul Malik.
The party state liaison committee deputy chief Donald Lim Siang Chai said it was pointless to allow the motion to be debated when BN is not the majority in the Selangor state assembly.
"There is no way that such a motion can be passed in Selangor as BN is the minority in the state assembly, unless of course DAP is willing to cooperate with PAS to allow the implementation of hudud. Therefore, I see no need for such a motion to be tabled," Malaysiakini quoted him saying.
Meanwhile, Selangor PAS commissioner Iskandar Abdul Samad questioned why UMNO only started to get interested about hudud implementation when they are now the opposition in Selangor.
“They have 50 years in Selangor but they did not do it. In Terengganu, the BN government had rejected hudud implementation in the state,” he reminded.
Sumber HD - 9-6-2014
Hudud debate - Horses’ Mouths – 13 June 2014
IRB Act
This initiative by the finance minister/prime minister is highly usual; it weakens democracy and lack transparency and accountability. If the Bill is passed, it will essentially transform the IRB into a quasi-investment body like 1MDB under his personal control.
Wong Chen, Kelana Jaya MP, claiming billions of taxpayers' money are at risk of being used to buy stocks, bonds, debts and properties under a proposed amendment to the Inland Revenue Board (IRB) of Malaysia Act allowing for an investment panel that could be as secretive as 1MDB
Custody dispute
The attorney-general will consult with the affected families. I hope everyone will respect the court's decision.
Najib Razak, Prime Minister, urging families involved in interfaith child custody cases to use the Federal Court to resolve them
But this should be the last resort. We prefer to send children in such situations to a family.
Rohani Abdul Karim, Women, Family and Community Development Minister, stressing that getting Welfare Department to take in children involved in inter-faith custody disputes, like those involving S Deepa and M Indira Gandhi, would be a last resort
Hudud debate in Selangor
I have approved motions from BN in the past simply because I believe that the state assembly is the right place for debate to take place. It does not matter if it comes from BN or Pakatan. I, as the speaker, have to be fair. If the motion deserves time in the assembly to be debated, we should. There is no point if everybody is talking about it outside (the assembly), but nobody wants to tackle it face-to-face.
Hannah Yeoh, Selangor Speaker, on approving Selangor BN's motion for a feasibility study on hudud to be debated in the state legislative assembly
There is no way that such a motion can be passed in Selangor as BN is the minority in the state assembly, unless of course DAP is willing to cooperate with PAS to allow the implementation of hudud. Therefore, I see no need for such a motion to be tabled.
Donald Lim, Selangor MCA state liaison committee deputy chief, called on the state assembly speaker Hannah Yeoh to stop prancing around a hudud motion that serves no purpose and will probably go nowhere
She is only exercising her role and duty constitutionally. She cannot take sides but be neutral as she can. Do you want her to be like BN speakers or democratic like Pakatan speakers?
Lim Guan Eng, DAP secretary general, supporting Hannah Yeoh for approving a motion on hudud to be tabled by BN in the state assembly
State assemblies have no business discussing what is clearly a criminal issue outside the legislative competence of state assemblies. I voted for Pakatan Rakyat in my Petaling Jaya constituency during the 13th general election last year. If I had known that my state assemblyperson was even going to touch on an unconstitutional issue, I would never have voted for PR.
Tommy Thomas, lawyer
Sumber HD - 12-6-2014
YB DSHK - Isu JKT :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jPRky6VrwE
Biar JK Teknikal Hudud bincang sesama sendiri - Jamil
KOTA BHARU: Buat pertama kali dalam sejarah teks khutbah Jumaat di masjid-masjid di Kelantan menyentuh isu pelaksanaan hukum hudud dua minggu berturut-turut.Teks khutbah tersebut disediakan Majlis Agama Islam dan Adat Istiadat Melayu Kelantan (Maik) dibaca para khatib.
Sehubungan itu Menteri Besar, Ustaz Datuk Ahmad Yakob merakamkan ucapan tahniah kepada Maik kerana memberi ruang menjelaskan isu hudud kepada orang ramai.
“Khutbah itu dibaca di seluruh masjid di negeri ini minggu lepas bagi memberi kefahaman kepada masyarakat berhubung hukum tersebut.
“Ini merupakan langkah proaktif bagi membantu kerajaan negeri dalam menjayakan pelaksanaan hudud di Kelantan. Terima kasih kepada panel yang menyedia teks khutbah isu hudud,” katanya ketika merasmikan Multaqa Imam, Guru Takmir dan Jawatankuasa Masjid Mukim Kelantan 2014 di Balai Islam semalam.
Turut hadir Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Jamil Khir Baharom, anggota Exco kerajaan negeri, Datuk Mohd Nassurudin Daud, Timbalan Mufti Kelantan, Datuk Nik Abdul Kadir Nik Muhammad dan Ketua Pengarah Jakim, Datuk Othman Mustafa.
Menteri Besar turut mengingatkan imam dan guru takmir supaya mendapat gambaran sebenar terhadap isu-isu semasa yang berlaku khususnya melibatkan kepentingan akidah.
Sementara itu Jamil Khir berkata, Jawatankuasa Teknikal Hudud Kebangsaan telah diwujudkan dan dibincang di peringkat kerajaan negeri dan Persekutuan.
“Perkara ini dibincang di peringkat kerajaan negeri dan Persekutuan. Sebab kita tak nak nanti heboh orang ni sebut macam ni, orang tu pula sebut macam tu.
“Nanti akan berlaku perkara negatif pula. Biarlah jawatankuasa teknikal berbincang sendiri sesama mereka,” ujarnya kepada media selepas program berkenaan.
Menurutnya juga dua perkara besar dibincang dalam jawatankuasa teknikal terbabit iaitu arah untuk memandu pelaksanaannya hudud sebelum dibawa ke Parlimen dan ke Majlis Raja-Raja.
Katanya, jawatankuasa terbabit perlu dilihat sebagai badan bebas dan bukannya mengikut wajah mana-mana parti.
“Kita mahu memastikan surat permohonan pelaksanaan hudud dibawa ke Parlimen tanpa melibatkan mana-mana suara dari mana-mana parti,” ujarnya. - HARAKAHDAILY 11/6/2014
Sumber HD - 11-6-2014
Mengapa bercakap tentang hudud setelah jadi pembangkang?
KUALA LUMPUR: Umno diminta melaksanakan hudud di negeri-negeri yang diperintah oleh BN dan bukannya mengusulkan pelaksanaan undang-undang jenayah syariah itu ketika menjadi pembangkang, kata Pesuruhjaya PAS Selangor, Iskandar Abdul Samad.Mengulas usul yang dikemukakan Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri (Adun) Sungai Air Tawar Kamarol Zaki Abdul Malik agar Dewan Negeri Selangor menggesa kerajaan negeri mengkaji keberangkalian melaksanakan undang-undang hudud, Iskandar menyifatkannya sebagai “hanya bermain politik”.
“Kenapa baru sekarang Umno hendak cadang bentang di Dewan? Mereka ada lebih 50 tahun (memerintah Selangor) tetapi tidak melakukannya?
“Hanya setelah mereka menjadi pembangkang di Selangor barulah mereka hendak bercakap tentang hudud?” ulas beliau ketika dihubungi Harakahdaily.
Menurut beliau, PAS telah mengadakan penerangan kepada rakyat tentang hukum jenayah syariah dan meluluskan enakmen berkaitan sebaik sahaja mendapat kuasa di Kelantan.
“Di Terengganu pula, kerajaan BN negeri telah menolak pelaksanaan hudud di negeri itu,” ujarnya.
Beliau yang juga Ahli Majlis Mesyuarat Kerajaan Negeri sekali lagi menegaskan bahawa Umno perlu melaksanakan undang-undang jenayah syariah di negeri yang dikuasai mereka jika benar-benar ikhlas ingin mendaulatkan syariat Islam dan tidak hanya bermain politik.
Kamarol Zaki dilapor telah menghantar usul kepada Dun Selangor agar kerajaan negeri digesa mengkaji kemungkinan melaksanakan hudud.
Salinan usul yang dicadangkan di bawah peraturan 26 Peraturan Tetap Dun itu menyebut:
“Bahawa dewan yang mulia ini menggesa agar kerajaan negeri Selangor mengkaji kebarangkalian pelaksanaan undang-undang hudud pada masa hadapan di negeri Selangor selaras dengan peruntukan perlembagaan persekutuan perkara 3 iaitu Islam sebagai agama persekutuan.” - HARAKAHDAILY, 10/6/2014
Sumber HD - 10-6-2014
No comments:
Post a Comment